Cases
RANDLE v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2020cv01154
Defendant: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
In Re: PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Plaintiff: DOROTHY RANDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorothy Randle v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv05085
Defendant: Does and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff: Dorothy Randle
Randle et al v. Baker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00357
Plaintiff: Leodis Randle, Karen Hall and Dorothy Randle
Defendant: Kristine Baker, Jana Harris and Billy Roy Willson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDLE et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv85282
Plaintiff: LEODIS RANDLE, LEODIS RANDLE, LEODIS RANDLE and others
Defendant: AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Davis, et al v. Bio-Med Applications We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-31034
Plaintiff - Appellant: BARBARA DAVIS, DOROTHY RANDLE and JOHNNY BENTON
Defendant - Appellee: BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF LOUISIANA LLC, doing business as Bio-Med Applications Bastrop
Davis et al v. Bio-Medical Applications of Louisiana L L C et al
as 3:2007cv01369
Plaintiff: Barbara Davis, Dorothy Randle and Johnny Benton
Defendant: Bio-Medical Applications of Louisiana L L C and X Y Z Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
RAINES et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66846
Plaintiff: CHARLES WARREN RAINES, JANEY RAINES, JANEY SUE RAINES and others
Defendant: AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?