Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCain v. Farrar et al
as 2:2020cv03164
Defendant:
Lt. Doughty, Capt. Kenneth Farrar, Classification Earlena Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D McCain, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doughty v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Tony Doughty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doughty v. Taylor et al
as 2:2018cv01197
Defendant:
Terrie Taylor, William R. Barker, Perry County Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Doughty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Lyons, Doughty & Veldhuis, P.C., et al
as 1:2018cv00513
Defendant:
Lyons, Doughty & Veldhuis, P.C. and John Does 1-25, John Does and Lyons, Doughty & Velhuis, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Tanisha Walker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ringler v. The Herald Publishing Company, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00457
Plaintiff:
Bruce Ringler
Defendant:
Herald Publishing Company, LLC, The , Frank Doughty and Aaron Phipps
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Doughty v. Midwest Neurosurgeons
as 5:2015cv00248
Plaintiff:
Alvin Doughty
Defendant:
Midwest Neurosurgeons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doughty v. BWXT Y-12, LLC (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00430
Plaintiff:
Michael Doughty
Defendant:
BWXT Y-12, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Doughty v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services et al (TV1)
as 3:2015cv00102
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Children's Services, Bailee Welch, Christy Bledsoe and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Doughty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
