Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Mark Gill v. City of Hammond, Indiana, et al
as 24-1328
Plaintiff:
MARK A. GILL
Defendant:
CITY OF HAMMOND, INDIANA, THOMAS MCDERMOTT, HAMMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Glaser et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Legacy Spencer
Defendant:
Edward Glaser, III and Doug Doughtie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DOUGHTIE v. DESANTIS et al
as 1:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
NATH C DOUGHTIE
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, CORD BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Witt v. State of Colorado, et al
as 23-1183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC WITT
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, DAVID R. DOUGHTY, JANEWAY LAW FIRM, P.C. and others
Defendant:
LEROY KIRBY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gill v. Hammond The City of et al
as 2:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Mark A Gill
Defendant:
Hammond The City of, Thomas M McDermott Jr, The Hammond Police Dpt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Witt v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2022cv02242
Plaintiff:
Eric Witt
Defendant:
State of Colorado, David R. Doughty, Teri Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
