Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Whitfield v. Buechler et al
as 1:2024cv03176
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Kenneth F. Buechler, Ph.D., Evelyn S. Dilsaver, Edward L. Michael and others
Bristol County Retirement System v. QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02804
Plaintiff:
Bristol County Retirement System
Defendant:
QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation, Douglas Bryant, Joseph Busky and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BRYANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv02302
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS BRYANT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryant v. Federal Express
as 1:2016cv01599
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bryant
Defendant:
Federal Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Dosier et al
as 5:2015cv03858
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth Dosier, Robert Berry, Michael Losch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 7:2012cv00349
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bryant
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Carleton Bryant v. Troy Mickelsen, et al
as 12-35522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLETON DOUGLAS BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
TROY MICKELSEN and CITY OF ALBANY, OREGON
Bryant v. Mickelsen et al
as 6:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Carleton Douglas Bryant
Defendant:
Troy Mickelsen and City of Albany, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
