Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rice v. Doe #1 et al
as 9:2026cv02137
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rice
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, John/Jane Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowd v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv08919
Petitioner:
Andrew Dowd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dowd v. J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2026cv06462
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Dowd
Defendant:
J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dowd v. Davis et al.
as 4:2026cv02585
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Dowd
Defendant:
TPU Supervisor Lt. Davis, C.O. Cole, Nurse Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Constantine
as 26-2430
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARC ELEFANT, ANDREW DOWD, SADY RIBEIRO and others
United States of America v. Constantine (Dowd)
as 26-2240
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GEORGE CONSTANTINE, MARC ELEFANT, SADY RIBEIRO and others
Crowe v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2026cv00650
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County, City of Charlotte, FNU Delcone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Thomas Goldstein
as 26-4392
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS C. GOLDSTEIN
Amicus Curiae:
PROFESSOR ANDREW MANUEL CRESPO, PROFESSOR JOSHUA DRESSLER, PROFESSOR CAROL STEIKER and others
Dowd v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2026cv04815
Plaintiff:
John Dowd
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Nassau County Police Officer McGowen, Nassau County Police Officer Winwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
