Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Khammesherma Smith v. Dr. Allen
as 23-6594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHAMMESHERMA SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ALLEN, Medical Team - Psychiatrist, DR. FURNESS, Medical Team - Doctor, MEDICAL CLINICIAN, Intake Physician/Inmate Evaluation and others
Smith v. Allen et al
as 6:2022cv02935
Plaintiff:
Khammesherma Smith
Defendant:
Dr Allen, Dr Furness, Medcal Clinician and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Sewell v. Corcoran et al
as 8:2018cv03439
Defendant:
Bezawit Addis, Dayena Corcoran, Laura Y. Armstead and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel E. Sewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Powers v. Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, VA et al
as 2:2018cv00373
Defendant:
Dr. Allen Shapiro, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, VA, Dr. Stephen Coats and others
Plaintiff:
Mona Olds Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Cline v. Allen et al
as 5:2017cv02391
Plaintiff:
Phillip E. Cline
Defendant:
Dr. Allen, Dominic McLain, Steven Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Ward v. Kuma DeBoo
as 12-7189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES I. WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
KUMA J. DEBOO, Warden, DR. RAMIREZ, Regional Clinical Director, DR. ALLEN, Chief of Health Programs, Central Office and others
Pelzer v. Cartledge et al
as 2:2010cv01104
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Pelzer
Defendant:
Leroy Cartledge, Linda Freeman, Dr Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv01075
Plaintiff:
Boyd Gilmore
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.,, Dr. Allen, Mary Westfall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilmore v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al
as 1:2009cv00136
Plaintiff:
Boyd Gilmore
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.,, Dr. Allen, Mary Westfall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
