Cases 71 - 80 of 117
Petersen v. California Department of Correction & Rehab. et al
as 3:2018cv02473
Defendant:
RJD Correctional Facility, Dr. Deel, Doe Defendants 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Petersen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carpino v. Naughton et al
as 3:2018cv00506
Defendant:
D. Marks, Melissa Mitchell, Dr. Martin Naughton and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Carpino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boucher, John v. Martin et al
as 3:2018cv00760
Defendant:
Dr. Martin and Debra Tidquist
Plaintiff:
John Boucher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickel v. Kamdar et al
as 2:2018cv00733
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Zucker, Dr. Faisal Quereshy, Dr. Ashok Das and others
Plaintiff:
Sabrina E. Mickel, DDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
March on Maryland, Inc. et al v. Churchill et al
as 1:2018cv00701
Plaintiff:
March on Maryland, Inc. , Anne Arundel County Indivisible Coalition , Caucus of African American Leaders and others
Defendant:
Ellington E. Churchill, Jr. and Michael Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jassiem v. Crawford et al
as 3:2017cv00736
Plaintiff:
Farried Jassiem
Defendant:
Jeffery Crawford, Moree Audey, R. Copp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duchnowski v. Armor Correctional Health Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv06214
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Inc., CO Mendez, CO Penge and others
Plaintiff:
Leo Duchnowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vida v. Fornia et al
as 3:2017cv01547
Defendant:
Summer Brielle, Franklin Collins, John L. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
George Vida, Margarete Vida and Robert Vida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Leonard v. Naughton
as 3:2017cv00556
Plaintiff:
Gregory N. Leonard
Defendant:
Dr. Martin Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Naughton et al
as 3:2017cv00549
Plaintiff:
Gregory N. Leonard
Defendant:
Dr. Dana Marks and Dr. Martin Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
