Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atencio, et al.
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Marco Marquez Hernandez
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Smith and Gwinnett County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spartz v. TeBrake et al
as 0:2019cv02739
Defendant:
Malinda Henderson, Blair Nyline, Dr. Shelia Brandt and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen George Spartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITING v. SMITH
as 4:2018cv00228
Defendant:
Dr. WALTER SMITH
Plaintiff:
TERRY WHITING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olrich v. Illichmann et al
as 2:2018cv01518
Defendant:
Miss Diebold, Stephanie Dunn, Dr Tokar and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Allen Olrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Cain et al
as 5:2018cv00677
Defendant:
Patience Cain, Correctional Managed Health Care & University of Texas Medical Branch, Debra Gloor and others
Plaintiff:
Perzia Bakari Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Livingston County
as 17-2860
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph A. Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas J. Dougherty, Jason A. Yasso, Donald W. Lubanski and others
Defendant:
Livingston County, Mental Health/Jail/Sheriff Depts, Michael Demp, Pam Trescott and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
