Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Rimer v. State of Nevada ex rel Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00889
Defendant:
Linda Adams, Dr. Romeo Aranas, Dr. Joyce Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Rimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low et al
as 5:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Franklin L. Williams
Defendant:
William Bethtold, M. Thomas, Dr. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
London v. Kaplin et al
as 2:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Defendant:
Roman Kaplin , T Williams, Dr Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Sawyer et al
as 5:2013cv00621
Plaintiff:
Cyril Webb
Defendant:
Gregory Sawyer, O Grajales, FNU Buggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martinez-Lopez v. Bechtold et al
as 5:2013cv00603
Plaintiff:
Jensen Martinez-Lopez
Defendant:
William Bechtold, W. Billy Romero, Andrew Mansukhani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carson v. Grajales et al
as 5:2013cv00507
Plaintiff:
Joseph Charles Carson
Defendant:
Dr. Grajales, S. S. Buggs, Dr. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Webb v. Sawyer et al
as 1:2013cv06350
Plaintiff:
Cyril Webb
Defendant:
Gregory Sawyer, O. Grajales, Buggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rimer v. Sandoval et al
as 2:2013cv01440
Defendant:
Eric Burson, Catherine Cortez-Masto, James G. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Rimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez-Diaz v. Lee et al
as 2:2013cv00989
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cortez-Diaz
Defendant:
Dr. Lee and Dr. Stradline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. DentalCare Partners, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00141
Plaintiff:
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners
Defendant:
DentalCare Partners, Inc. , Dental One, Inc. , DCP Equity Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
