Cases 41 - 50 of 1,817
Edward Hill v. Stacie Heidenreich, et al
as 23-2034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD DUANE HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STACIE HEIDENREICH, Registered Nurse (SH24) "also spelled Stacey on complaint" in her individual and official capacities, SUZANNE E. GROFF, Nurse Practitioner (SG6) in her individual and official capacities, MICHAEL TRAVIS, Registered Nurse (MT10) in his individual and official capacities and others
Butler v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00396
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Rainbolt
as 6:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Butler
Defendant:
Carmen Rainbolt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEMISON, JR. v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA
as 2:2023cv01958
Petitioner:
DUANE W. JEMISON and DUANE W. JEMISON, JR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silva v. State of New York et al
as 9:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Santo Carrero Silva
Defendant:
State of New York and Mark Duane Lentini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. BRANCH et al
as 4:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
DUANE WOULLARD
Defendant:
BRANCH, NAFINA LANGLEY, A ACOSTA-MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas LaCruze v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 23-3078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS LACRUZE
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, DUANE ALSIP, JONATHAN JACKSON and others
Throneberry v. Nunn
as 23-6165
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDALL DUANE THRONEBERRY
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT NUNN, Warden
Butler v. Bryning et al
as 6:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Butler
Defendant:
David Bryning, Karen Hughes, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
