Cases 1 - 10 of 90
(PC) Duclos v. Mraz
as 2:2026cv00762
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
D. Mraz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duclos v. Mraz
as 1:2026cv01810
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
D. Mraz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Duclos v. McFadyen et al
as 1:2026cv01165
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
J. McFadyen and S. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duclos v. McFadyen et al
as 2:2026cv00370
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
J. McFadyen and S. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duclos v. Lifespace Communities, Inc. et al
as 9:2025cv81447
Plaintiff:
Ruth D Duclos
Defendant:
Lifespace Communities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv00422
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Duclos v. Estupinan
as 2:2025cv03040
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
J. Estupinan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Cox et al
as 9:2025cv12572
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Michael Williams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Cox, A. Duclos, J. Neely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUCLOS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2025cv12417
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE DUCLOS and ESTATE OF LORI TROUTMAN
Unknown:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DuClos v. Penaherrer et al
as 8:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Don Matthew DuClos
Defendant:
Sgt. Penaherrer and CO Onofrei
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
