Cases 31 - 40 of 739
Harris v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Jaamal-David Gregory Harris
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, HRRJ Correctional Officers, HRRJ Maintenance Officer Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
LANCE v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Dr. Rachel Marie Lance
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HOLMAN v. WIGGS et al
as 1:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
QUENTON D. HOLMAN
Defendant:
A.T. WIGGS, K. KLUTTZ, UNIDENTIFIED DUKE CAMPUS POLICE OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. David Meyers
as 23-6722
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS, a/k/a Duke Meyers, a/k/a David Myers, a/k/a Diamond Meyers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kimner v. Duke Energy Corporation
as 3:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Audrey Kimner
Defendant:
Duke Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
US v. Donald Martin, Jr.
as 23-4424
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD MARTIN, JR., a/k/a Duke
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dukes v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Christopher Dukes
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HOLMAN v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOL LAW ENFORCEMENT, ET AL.,
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
QUENTON DAMON HOLMAN
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOL LAW ENFORCEMENT, A.T. WIGGS, K. KLUTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
