Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Durrette v. Davis
as 2:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
James Durrette
Respondent:
Clint Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Durrett v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
Donald Durrett
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Rashall Brackney-Wheelock v. City of Charlottesville
as 23-1129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RASHALL M. BRACKNEY-WHEELOCK, Ph.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, CHARLES BOYLES, a/k/a Chip, Former City Manager with Charlottesville, LISA ROBERTSON, City Attorney and others
Brackney-Wheelock v. City of Charlottesville et al
as 3:2022cv00035
Defendant:
Charles Boyles, Latroy Durrette, City of Charlottesville and others
Plaintiff:
Rashall M. Brackney-Wheelock, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Abbott et al v. Gerber Products Company
as 1:2021cv00789
Plaintiff:
rebecca abbott, Erin Abdoo, Sophia Alfaro and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Benedict College et al
as 3:2020cv04064
Defendant:
Haywood Bazemore, Kevin Portee, Jonathan Durrett and others
Plaintiff:
Marquisiel Smith and Adrian Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Tarsha Gerald v. Morgan Minor
as 16-1950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TARSHA GERALD
Defendant - Appellee:
MORGAN MINOR, CPS, CHRISTINA SELF, CPS, JENNY JONES, Chief and others
Gerald v. Minor et al
as 3:2016cv00650
Plaintiff:
Tarsha Gerald
Defendant:
Morgan Minor, Christina Self, Jenny Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
