Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Helle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01512
Plaintiff:
Dustin Dean Helle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BRANGES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18859
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN DEAN BRANGES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dean v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2021cv05822
Plaintiff:
Dustin Dean
Defendant:
Timothy Rankine, Masyih Ford, Tacoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dustin Dean, et al v. Crosscountry Mortgage, Inc., et al
as 20-40365
Defendant / Appellee:
DOVENMUEHLE MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORI DEAN and DUSTIN DEAN
Dean et al v. Crosscountry Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00705
Defendant:
Crosscountry Mortgage, Inc., Federal National Mortgage Association and Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Dean and Dustin Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dean v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00289
Petitioner:
Dustin Dean
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nansel et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv09021
Plaintiff:
Loyd K. Nansel , Loyd K. Nansel Trust , Ronald M. Bartek and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nansel et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02134
Plaintiff:
Loyd K. Nansel , Loyd K. Nansel Trust , Ronald M. Bartek and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dann v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2014cv00167
Petitioner:
Dustin Dean Dann
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
