Cases 1 - 10 of 19
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09241
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT FRANKLIN JOHNSON, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sweet v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
Dwight Franklin Sweet
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. Franklin et al
as 3:2021cv00617
Defendant:
Unknown Brown, Eric Dwight Franklin, Unknown Hells and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv09574
Plaintiff:
Melvin Dwight Franklin
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Burkhart v. Franklin et al
as 2:2016cv04292
Plaintiff:
Dustin Scott Burkhart
Defendant:
Dwight Franklin, Chris Moehle, Shawn Gerdiman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Haynes-Love et al
as 4:2016cv12671
Plaintiff:
Dwight Franklin Blackmon
Defendant:
Haynes-Love, Spencer Burke, Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon #850454 v. Haynes-Love et al
as 1:2016cv00657
Plaintiff:
Dwight Franklin Blackmon #850454
Defendant:
Unknown Haynes-Love, Spencer Burke, Unknown Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Smith, III v. Brian Keedy, et al
as 16-1003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Elmer Smith, III
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Keedy, Camden County Prosecuting Attorney, Patrick Ramshead, Camdenton City Police Officer, Laura Wright, Camdenton City Police Chief and others
Corron v. Vance et al
as 2:2015cv04110
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Corron
Defendant:
Sue Vance, Dwight Franklin, Todd Bithell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lagares et al v. Koeppen
as 6:2015cv03170
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lagares, Jr, Sherry Lagares, K.L. and others
Defendant:
Aaron Koeppen , Kenneth M. Hayden , Steven B. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
