Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Tyler Evan James et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
TYLER E JAMES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPUTY LUTTENBACHER and DEPUTY MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund et al v. McMullen et al
as 1:2024cv02208
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant:
Marcus T McMullen, Shipley, Jr. E. James and Manly Shipley, LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
James v. State of New York
as 24-624
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. JAMES
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK and DONITA E. MCINTOSH, FORMER CLINTON DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF PROGRAM
James v. D'Amore
as 24-474
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER E. JAMES
Respondent:
MICHAEL D'AMORE, Superintendent of Marcy Correctional Facility
James v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Davena E. James
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
JAMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23935
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E JAMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Millsaps v. Mullen et al
as 5:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Marvin W. Millsaps
Defendant:
Jason Todd Mullen, C. E. James, A. Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. James
as 4:2022cv02886
Plaintiff:
Fitz D Jackson
Defendant:
Courtney E James
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
James v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02841
Plaintiff:
Joe E. James
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James v. The State of New York et al
as 2:2022cv01404
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. James
Defendant:
The State of New York and Ms. McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
