Cases 11 - 20 of 571
Wilson v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00687
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15508
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Novak et al
as 3:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Wilson
Defendant:
David J Novak and Judge Mark R. Colombell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Novak et al
as 5:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Wilson
Defendant:
Judge David J. Novak and Judge Mark R. Colombell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Wilson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOOLD et al v. OPERA et al
as 2:2023cv03527
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ANN GOOLD and BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
DANIEL OPERA, MARY ROSE OPERA, UPPER SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson et al v. Rayborn Construction, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00245
Counter Defendant:
Jason E. Wilson and LJW Properties, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Rayborn Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wilson v. Arthur
as 3:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Wilson
Defendant:
Beth Arthur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Arlington Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Wilson
Defendant:
Arlington Virginia and Quiroz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
