Cases 21 - 30 of 30
CAPITAL ONE VENTURES, LLC. et al
as 1:2010cv10780
Plaintiff:
CAPITAL ONE VENTURES, LLC., VIRGINIA WOOD, MARCUS, ERRICO, EMMER & BROOKS, P.C. and others
Defendant:
TRUSTEES OF THE 303-309 MAPLE STREET CONDOMINIUM TRUST, ERIN O'BRIEN, DOES 1 THROUGH 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROYSTER v. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY et al
as 1:2010cv00395
Plaintiff:
GAIL ROYSTER
Defendant:
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, ELIZABETH A. HERMAN, ELIZABETH J. BRANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GRIFFIN v. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY et al
as 1:2010cv00396
Plaintiff:
CASSIE GRIFFIN
Defendant:
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, ELIZABETH A. HERMAN, ELIZABETH J. BRANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooks v. CIGNA Group Insurance et al
as 2:2009cv14757
Defendant:
CIGNA Group Insurance, Crittenton Hospital Medical Center, Crittenton Hospital Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Jody E Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Brooks v. Midland Funding, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00201
Plaintiff:
Latricia E Brooks
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc and Renae Kiffmeyer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Quest Software Inc
as 8:2009cv00315
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Quest Software Inc, Vincent C Smith, John J Laskey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
United States v. Thomas Brooks
as 07-3147
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States
Defendant - Appellant:
Thomas E. Brooks
BROOKS V DVA
as 00-7167
Claimant-Appellant:
GREGORY E. BROOKS
Respondent-Appellee:
HERSHEL W. GOBER, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
