Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Brooks v. State Of Alabama
as 1:2010cv00594
Petitioner:
Michael E. Brooks
Respondent:
State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Ducart
as 4:2010cv01134
Plaintiff:
Charlie E. Brooks
Defendant:
D.E. Ducart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Dumas et al
as 1:2010cv01631
Plaintiff:
James E Brooks, Jr
Defendant:
Leland Dumas, John Barry and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Horel et al
as 4:2009cv03749
Plaintiff:
Charlie E. Brooks
Defendant:
Robert A. Horel, Franciso Jacquez and C. Essex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Arresting Officers et al
as 3:2009cv00975
Plaintiff:
Carlos E. Brooks
Defendant:
Arresting Officers and Robert White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Legislative Bill Room
as 4:2009cv05312
Plaintiff:
Charlie E. Brooks
Defendant:
Legislative Bill Room
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. City of Pine Knot et al
as 6:2009cv00267
Petitioner:
Anthony E. Brooks
Respondent:
City of Pine Knot, City Attorneys Offices, State of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00605
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen and Brad Livingston
Plaintiff:
Clyde E Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. City of N.N. Virginia et al
as 2:2009cv00269
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Brooks
Defendant:
City of N.N. Virginia, N.N. Va. Police Dept., Chief of Police (Det.) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garcia et al v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00337
Plaintiff:
Alfred Garcia, Cornelius Alix, Anthony J Boyd and others
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
