Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Combs v. Giddens et al
as 3:2020cv00563
Defendant:
T. Giddens, B. Cabell, M. Carta Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Henry County Police department et al
as 1:2019cv02405
Defendant:
R. Miles #6739, C. Godfrey #5831, Sgt. E. Combs #5378 and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Paul Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Singal et al
as 0:2016cv62944
Plaintiff:
Irvin E. Combs
Defendant:
Raag Singal, John Goodman, Anai Le Master and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Lt. Jean Baptist et al
as 0:2016cv62890
Plaintiff:
Irvin E. Combs
Defendant:
Lt. Jean Baptist, Elias Pino, Jorge Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kincade v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Roderick E Kincade
Defendant:
Elijoh R Sanchez, Christopher L Gouldy, NFN Richard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Combs v. Harold Clarke
as 13-7637
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EDWARD COMBS, a/k/a Lawrence E. Combs
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Respondent:
CIRCUIT COURT FOR CITY OF HAMPTON, VIRGINIA
Combs v. Circuit Court for City of Hampton, Virginia
as 3:2012cv00676
Petitioner:
Lawrence E. Combs
Respondent:
Circuit Court for City of Hampton, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Corey James v. Fred Nastri
as 11-7058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LAMONDE JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH F. NEDER, Ex-Warden NBCI, DAVID WILHELM, Sgt., BOBBY SHEARIN and others
James v. Nastri et al
as 8:2010cv02272
Plaintiff:
Corey Lamonde James
Defendant:
Fred Nastri, Joseph F. Neder, Brian Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
