Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Charles Clagett, III v. J. Woodring, et al
as 14-55051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES T. CLAGETT, III, AKA Charles Thomas Clagett, III
Defendant - Appellee:
J. WOODRING, Terminal Island FCI, CANTRELL, Captain, YOUNG, AW and others
Brown v. Gipson et al
as 1:2013cv02084
Plaintiff:
William E. Brown
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, J. D. Wilson, A. Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castro v. Wilson
as 1:2013cv01039
Petitioner:
Juan E. Castro
Respondent:
E.D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cooper v. Capt. Jamison et al
as 2:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Joe Cooper
Defendant:
Capt. Jamison, R. Stamm, Capt. Benevides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. Wilson
as 1:2013cv00675
Petitioner:
Juan E. Castro
Respondent:
E. D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lorenzo Glenn v. M. Barber, et al
as 13-40437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO GLENN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN M. BARBER, in her Official Capacity, MAJOR E. CASTRO, in her Individual and Official Capacity, LIEUTENANT L. TODD, in his Individual and Official Capacity and others
Castro v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Jorge E Castro
Defendant:
FNU Vasquez and Bureau of Prison, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chavez v. Kings County et al
as 1:2013cv00342
Plaintiff:
Juan Chavez
Defendant:
Kings County, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rigoberto Castro v. USA
as 13-1098
Petitioner - Appellant:
RIGOBERTO E. CASTRO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alvin Ross v. E. Castro, et al
as 13-15074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIN RONNEL ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
E. CASTRO, J. GONZALES, Facility Sergeant, J. A. KEENER, Facility Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
