Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Haynes v. Young Life
as 3:2008cv00258
Plaintiff:
Amanda E Haynes and Amanda E Haynes
Defendant:
Young Life
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HAYNES v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71714
Plaintiff:
LOUISE E. HAYNES
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SAIN v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2007cv00830
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN SAIN
Defendant:
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA, WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, D. E. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02742
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
HAYNES v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2007cv61147
Plaintiff:
JAMES E HAYNES
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, UNIROYAL INC, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HAYNES et al
as 2:2007cv61234
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH HAYNES and JAMES E HAYNES
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Gregoire, et al v. Lucent Technologies, et al
as 6:2003cv00251
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Gregoire, Nicholas R. Frisco, Salvatore N. Mancuso and others
Defendant:
Lucent Technologies, Inc. and Agere Systems, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Jay M. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
James E. Haynes v. ACandS, Inc., et al.
as SC/2:02-CV-00769
Defendant:
ACandS, Inc
Plaintiff:
James E. Haynes
Levinson, et al v. Primedia, Inc., et al
as 1:2002cv02222
Plaintiff:
Deborah Levinson , Theresa Jansen , Jana M. Jones and others
Defendant:
Primedia, Inc. , About.com, Inc. , Scott Kurnit and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 97-5110
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
