Cases 1 - 10 of 27
King v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2020cv00270
Defendant:
City of Akron, RYAN P MCPHERSON, Kenneth Ball and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK E KING and Patrick King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chmielewski v. Washington et al
as 2:2019cv12152
Defendant:
Ricardo Moore, Brian Shipman, Tim Flanagan and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Chmielewski
Villarreal v. Pigott et al
as 2:2017cv12469
Plaintiff:
David Villarreal
Defendant:
Bill J. Pigott, Landon R. VanWormer, Katie Schall and others
Parker #218977 v. King et al
as 1:2016cv01012
Plaintiff:
John Parker #218977
Defendant:
Anthony E. King, Kevin Belk, Amy M. Bonito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv01184
Plaintiff:
Mark E. King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Collier et al v. Wellmont Health System et al (JRG1)
as 2:2015cv00330
Plaintiff:
Jon Collier and Virginia Collier
Defendant:
Wellmont Health System, Wellmont Medical Associates, Inc., James Patrick Beckner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nunlee #537539 v. Combs et al
as 1:2013cv01324
Plaintiff:
Dennis Howard Nunlee #537539
Defendant:
Thomas Combs, Amy Bonito, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
United States of America v. King et al
as 4:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Donna E. King, MRC Receivables Corp. and Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Kocenda v. Western Michigan University et al
as 1:2011cv00761
Plaintiff:
David Walter Kocenda
Defendant:
Western Michigan University , Western Michigan University Board of Control , Denise J. Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
