Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Perry v. Saghir et al
as 7:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Cheryl E. Perry
Defendant:
Mohamed Ahmedou Saghir and Al Express Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Perry v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00034
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Perry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ML-CFC 2007-8 Harbor View Boulevard, LLC v. Perry
as 2:2018cv00245
Plaintiff:
ML-CFC 2007-8 Harbor View Boulevard, LLC
Defendant:
Donald E. Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06674
Plaintiff:
Susan E. Perry
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv03618
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Perry
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rachel Perry v. Charleston Area Medical Center
as 14-1626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RACHEL E. PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLESTON AREA MEDICAL CENTER, INCORPORATED
PERRY v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00429
Plaintiff:
VERNON E. PERRY
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES. INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Perry v. Jones et al
as 3:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Perry
Defendant:
Joyce Jones and Ken Peare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14885
Plaintiff:
Michele Dixon and William E. Perry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perry v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
as 2:2013cv13598
Plaintiff:
Rachel E. Perry
Defendant:
Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
