Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Khanisa Darby v. 120 Northampton LLC, et al
as 26-3289
Plaintiff:
KHANISA DARBY
Defendant:
120 NORTHAMPTON LLC, POST ROAD MANAGEMENT LLC, BORKO MILOSEV and others
Redd-Sykes v. Fidorchyk et al
as 1:2026cv02606
Plaintiff:
Tyvon M. Redd-Sykes
Defendant:
Fidorchyk, Fritz, Medavitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NARANJO v. DOC EMPLOYEES et al
as 2:2026cv06554
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
DOC EMPLOYEES, STACEY A. PLASSIO, MELISSA L. MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoemaker v. Uptown Rental Properties, L.L.C.
as 2:2026cv00361
Plaintiff:
Sarah Elizabeth Shoemaker
Defendant:
Uptown Rental Properties, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Peterson et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01053
Plaintiff:
Matthew Peterson, Angela Petroff, Kimberly Quarture and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Shoemake v. Universal Plant Services, LLC
as 4:2026cv06746
Plaintiff:
Nicknus Shoemake
Defendant:
Universal Plant Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Shoemaker v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2026cv00282
Plaintiff:
Margaret Shoemaker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Humbert v. Marshall et al
as 3:2026cv02040
Plaintiff:
Eric Humbert
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, Michael Pugh, Marrcus Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mercy Schelmety v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2026cv01915
Plaintiff:
Mercy Schelmety
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Jim Wilbur, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Amar v. Shoemaker et al
as 3:2026cv00729
Plaintiff:
Phillip Amar
Defendant:
Rodney Shoemaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
