Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jackson v. Frye et al
as 4:2021cv00159
Defendant:
Jared Frye, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., Earle M. Jorgensen Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Earle M Jorgensen Company
as 2:2019cv00907
Plaintiff:
State of Washington, Suquamish Tribe, United States and others
Defendant:
Earle M Jorgensen Co and Earle M Jorgensen Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Earle M. Jorgensen Company
as 2:2017cv00710
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
PAINTER TOOL, INC. v. DUNKIRK SPECIALTY STEEL, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
PAINTER TOOL, INC.
Defendant:
DUNKIRK SPECIALTY STEEL, LLC and EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Earle M. Jorgensen Company
as 2:2016cv00861
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Earle M. Jorgensen Company
as 2:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Champagne Metals v. Ken-Mac Metals Inc et al
as 8:2008cv01431
Plaintiff:
Champagne Metals
Defendant:
Ken-Mac Metals Inc, Ken-Mac Metals Inc, Ken-Mac Metals Inc and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
