Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Pennington Plaintiffs, et al. v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc., et al.
as 26-5960
Plaintiff:
PENNINGTON PLAINTIFFS and SAN FRANCISCO SHIPYARD RESIDENTS
Defendant:
TETRA TECH EC, INC., TETRA TECH, INC., LENNAR CORPORATION and others
Davis v. Camejo Serrano et al
as 3:2026cv00970
Plaintiff:
Miles Davis
Defendant:
Edel Camejo Serrano and Edel Camejo Serrano d/b/a EC Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
San Francisco Shipyard Residents, et al. v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc., et al.
as 26-5864
Plaintiff:
SAN FRANCISCO SHIPYARD RESIDENTS, JORGE HIDROBO, LIEN CHI and others
Defendant:
TETRA TECH EC, INC., TETRA TECH, INC., ANDREW BOLT and others
Jane Doe EC (WHB 0023) v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2026cv09522
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe EC (WHB 0023)
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Woodson et al v. Thomas et al
as 1:2026cv09932
Plaintiff:
Brian Woodson and Jereme M Collins
Defendant:
KJ Thomas, OD Ogude, D Ramey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United States v. Herion et al
as 1:2026cv09868
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Joshua Herion and ECS Roofing Professionals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
