Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 206
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Taylor v. Eckerd Corporation
as 5:2023cv00877
Plaintiff: Jeffrey L. Taylor, II
Defendant: Eckerd Corporation doing business as Rite Aid
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant: WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified: HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party: IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff: Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner: TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
The Kroger Co. v. Mastercard Inc.
as 1:2006cv00039
Special Master: James Orenstein
Plaintiff: The Kroger Co., Albertson's, Inc., Safeway, Inc. and others
Defendant: Mastercard Inc. and Mastercard International Incorporated
Amicus Curiae: U.S. Public Research Interest Group
Not Classified By Court: 1001 Property Solutions LLC, Temple Eagle Partners LLC, Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
County of Trumbull v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 1:2018op45079
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Actavis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: County of Trumbull
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Walgreen Co, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Ohio CVS Stores, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-5000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
County of Lake v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45032
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Actavis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: County of Lake
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Walgreen Co., Rite Aid of Ohio, Inc., Rite Aid Headquarters Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-5000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
White et al v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01239
Plaintiff: Andrew White, Mark Rosenberg, United States of America and others
Defendant: Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid of Alabama, Inc., Rite Aid of Connecticut, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Patrick County, Virginia v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op46149
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, Beverly Sackler, Mark Timney and others
Plaintiff: Patrick County, Virginia
Susanville Elementary School District et al v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022op45031
Plaintiff: Susanville Elementary School District and Lassen County Office of Education
Defendant: Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hancock County Board of Education et al v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022op45027
Plaintiff: Hancock County Board of Education and Hamblen County Board of Education
Defendant: Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., TEVA Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?