Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cerrato et al v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02602
Plaintiff:
Henry Paz Cerrato, Pedro Gomez, Edgardo Flores Sequeiros and others
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Cerelyn Davis, R. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
San Jose Restaurant, Inc. v. Laura Pontones
as 19-445
Petitioner:
SAN JOSE OF ROANOKE RAPIDS, INC., SAN JOSE MEXICAN RESAURANT OF ELIZABETHTOWN, INC., EDGAR FLORES and others
Respondent:
LAURA PONTONES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Pontones v. San Jose Restaurant, Incorporated et al
as 5:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Laura Pontones
Defendant:
San Jose Restaurant, Incorporated, San Jose Management, Inc, San Jose Mexican Restaurant #2 of Lumberton, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arellano Galvan, et al v. San Jose Mexican Restaurant of NC, Inc., et al
as 7:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Arellano Galvan , Jose Alfredo Avila Torres and Rafael Aaron Brito Martinez
Defendant:
San Jose Mexican Restaurant of NC, Inc., San Jose Mexican Restaurant #2 of Lumberton, Inc., San Jose Mexican Restaurant of Pembroke, NC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Lazio Ramirez et al v. Bestway Supermercado et al
as 1:2014cv00241
Plaintiff:
Joel Antonio Lazio Ramirez , Elmer Alexander Deras Guevera , Pedro Amaya and others
Defendant:
Bestway Supermercado, D.T. I. International and Michael Choi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alex Flores-Banegas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-60647
Petitioner:
ALEX EDGARDO FLORES-BANEGAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Luis Joaquin Jacobs et al v. American Executive Protection et al
as 2:2010cv07611
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Flores Jasso, Luis C Cazares, Joaquin Rosas and others
Defendant:
Carlos Perez, Vallarta Supermarkets Inc, VIP Security Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
