Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Edmond v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2026cv26321
Plaintiff:
Pascale Adrien Edmond
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Marks v. Lovelace et al
as 2:2026cv01662
Plaintiff:
Jerry Marks
Defendant:
Greg Lovelace, Sanders, Vencini Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDMONDS v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2026cv06983
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW EDMONDS
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Beba v. Nelson
as 26-30537
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Beba, Jr.
Defendant:
Roman Nelson, in his individual capacity, Larry White, in his individual capacity, New Orleans City, through New Orleans Fire Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02605
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Malloy v. Smith et al
as 2:2026cv01616
Plaintiff:
Latransezon Malloy
Defendant:
Warden III Vencini Smith, Captain Akeem Edmond and LT Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
