Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Duke v. USA
as 4:2023cv11538
Petitioner:
Ronnie Edward Duke
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Ronnie Duke
as 22-1624
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONNIE EDWARD DUKE
Dukes et al v. Canal Woods LLC PH et al
as 1:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Edward Dukes and Pearlie Dukes
Defendant:
Canal Woods LLC PH and Long Logging Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Afendoules et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv11604
Plaintiff:
James Partridge, Barbara Denton, James Smith and others
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Bayer AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AFENDOULES et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv09291
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARTRIDGE, BARBARA DENTON, JAMES SMITH and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AFENDOULES et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 3:2019cv09291
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARTRIDGE, BARBARA DENTON, JAMES SMITH and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duke v. USA
as 2:2019cv10736
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ronnie Edward Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Ronnie Duke
as 16-2128
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONNIE EDWARD DUKE
Dukes v. Smith et al
as 9:2015cv04369
Plaintiff:
Edward Dukes
Defendant:
Wendell Smith and Flanigan and Smith LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Dukes, Jr. v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv11703
Plaintiff:
Edward Dukes, Jr.
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing,Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
