Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Wood v. Doe et al
as 1:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
James Edward Wood
Defendant:
John Doe, Steve Doe and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Woods et al
as 2:2011mj01198
Defendant:
Donte Ray Gardner (3), Christopher Henson (5), Lennox L. Hinks (7) and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Unknown:
US Attorney's Office and Armilla T Staley-Ngomo
Cory Edward Woods
as 2:2011mj01198
Plaintiff:
USA
Unknown:
US Attorney's Office and Armilla T Staley-Ngomo
Defendant:
Cory Edward Woods (1)
Wood v. Walton et al
as 1:2010cv03422
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Wood
Defendant:
Dean Anthony Walton , State Farm Insurance , KMGP Services Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
WOODS v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND. INC. et al
as 2:2010cv66979
Plaintiff:
EDWARD WOODS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND. INC., EASTERN MAGNESIA TALC, FLEXITALLIC INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. USA
as 5:2010cv80244
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bruce Edward Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wood v. Walton et al
as 1:2009cv03398
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Wood
Defendant:
Dean Anthony Walton, Dean Anthony Walton, State Farm Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
WOODS v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv92565
Plaintiff:
GARLAND EDWARD WOODS, GARLAND EDWARD WOODS and GARLAND EDWARD WOODS
Defendant:
GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
US v. Bruce Woods
as 09-8180
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRUCE EDWARD WOODS
Wood v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00774
Plaintiff:
Matthew Edward Wood
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
