Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Edwin DeJesus v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 22-12431
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWIN DEJESUS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
United States of America v. Swinton (Smith)
as 22-165
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kareem Swinton, AKA K., Harold Butler, AKA Haas, Edwin DeJesus and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Andre Smith, AKA Dre
United States of America v. Swinton (Sullivan)
as 20-3312
Defendant:
Jerrod Steele, Kareem Swinton, AKA K., Clivens Pierre and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David Sullivan, AKA Day-Day
DeJesus v. Secretary Department of Corrections
as 9:2020cv80190
Plaintiff:
Edwin DeJesus
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Edwin Mejia-Morales v. Attorney General United States
as 19-2476
Petitioner:
EDWIN DEJESUS MEJIA-MORALES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FIFTY FIVE THOUAND DOLLARS ($55,000.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2014cv05913
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FIFTY FIVE THOUAND DOLLARS ($55,000.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant:
EDWIN DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Jose V. Estrada et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 2:2014cv04014
Plaintiff:
Mildred Placa Altieri, Camilo Falcon Arroyo, Efrain Cruz Batista and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Salaman v. DeJesus et al
as 3:2011cv01993
Plaintiff:
Luis Angel Salaman
Defendant:
Edwin DeJesus, J. Peterson, Frank Limon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
