Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03512
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
State of Minnesota v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01946
Petitioner: Minnesota Department of Human Services
Plaintiff: STATE OF MINNESOTA
Defendant: SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C., NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND CO.
Special Master: HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, RET.
State of Minnesota v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2021mc00081
Plaintiff: State of Minnesota
Defendant: Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Novo Nordisk, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Co.
Petitioner: Minnesota Department of Human Services
AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2021cv01922
Plaintiff: AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND CO. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
CLARK v. ELI LILLY AND CO.
as 1:2020cv00671
Plaintiff: Ruth Clark
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15481
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14925
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
STATE OF MINNESOTA, BY ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL LORI SWANSON v. SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv14999
Defendant: SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, ELI LILLY AND CO. and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Plaintiff: STATE OF MINNESOTA, BY ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL LORI SWANSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Robinson v. Eli Lilly and Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00338
Plaintiff: Timothy Robinson
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04121
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?