Cases 41 - 50 of 1,801
Dudley v. Hochul et al
as 5:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Ellis Davon Dudley, II
Defendant:
Governor Kathy Hochul, New York State, Dr. James V. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Lee Johnson v. City of Pomona et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Johnson
Defendant:
City of Pomona, Michael Ellis, Michel Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dees et al v. Zurlo et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Dees and Ethan Davis Smith
Defendant:
Michael Zurlo, Jeffrey R. Brown, Jillian Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaney Gooden v. Jackson Public Schools et al
as 3:2023cv03177
Plaintiff:
Vicki L. Chaney Gooden
Defendant:
Jackson Public Schools, Campus Enforcement, Roosevelt Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Guardia Piazza D'Oro, LLC v. Ellis-Sanders et al
as 3:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
Guardia Piazza D'Oro, LLC
Defendant:
Oudree Ellis-Sanders and Stormi Sanders
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Tony Forrester v. Lyn Simmons
as 23-2288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY GENE FORRESTER
Defendant / Appellee:
LYN MICHELE SIMMONS, VICTORIA ANN LATHAM and JARRETT CHRISTOPHER ELLIS
Johnson v. City of Monroe
as 23-30893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Johnson and Mallory Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Monroe, Oliver Ellis, also known as Friday Ellis, Michael Fendall and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
