Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hyde v. Whataburger Restaurants L L C et al
as 3:2026cv03603
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hyde
Defendant:
Whataburger Restaurants L L C, Elvie Schmidt and Progressive Security Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv00534
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROSARIO v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv12106
Plaintiff:
ELVIS ROSARIO
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Zazueta v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv05227
Plaintiff:
Elvis Zazueta
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 fl FLSA: Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01781
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Joshua M. Ambush, LLC, et al v. Elvis Rusnak
as 26-7181
Petitioner:
Joshua M. Ambush, LLC and Joshua M. Ambush
Respondent:
Elvis Rusnak
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04202
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026at03337
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07137
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Ekeh v. Grunder et al
as 6:2026cv01272
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ekeh
Defendant:
Brian Grunder, (fnu) Bogo, Jan Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
