Cases 41 - 50 of 315
Francis Walter Startup v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2014cv01032
Defendant:
DOES, EMC Mortgage Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Walter Startup
Lofton Ryan Burris et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 2:2014cv03247
Defendant:
Kevin Maliczak, Altsource, L. Jay Angelle and others
Plaintiff:
Lofton Ryan Burris, Lupi P. Edwards, Eutimio C. Hernandez and others
The Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv10582
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation , J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Defendants John Doe 1-50
Plaintiff:
The Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
EMC Corporation v. Chevedden et al
as 1:2014cv10233
Plaintiff:
EMC Corporation
Defendant:
John Chevedden and James McRitchie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Casault v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as AZ/2:14-cv-00145
Plaintiff:
Tom Casault
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA , EMC Mortgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association
James Adams, et al v. Aurora Loan Services, Inc., et al
as 14-15031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. ADAMS, Realtor and PUOY K. PREMSRIRUT, Realtor
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex. rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
AURORA LOAN SERVICES, INC., BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, BANK OF AMERICA, NA and others
EMC CORPORATION v. PROSER CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv07506
Petitioner:
EMC CORPORATION
Respondent:
PROSER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moreno v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jaime Moreno
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Equity Trustees, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
