Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Ridley v. Emmerson et al
as 1:2026cv00100
Petitioner:
Edward Tyrone Ridley
Respondent:
Judge David Emmerson and The State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phiri v. Anderson Center for Autism et al
as 7:2025cv05814
Plaintiff:
Emmerson Phiri
Defendant:
Anderson Center for Autism, Patrick D Paul, John Doe 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Emmanuel et al v. Wynn Records et al
as 1:2025cv02833
Plaintiff:
Martins Chukwuka Emmanuel, Abel Great Umaru, Kelvin Ayodeji Campbell and others
Defendant:
Wynn Records, Emmerson Amidu Bockarie, Carlos Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 cp Copyright Infringement
JONES v. EMMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01624
Defendant:
DAVID EMMERSON, S. OBI, E. OSEI and others
Plaintiff:
KAMREN JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Sage et al
as 3:2024cv01447
Defendant:
J. Heally, Emmerson and Jessica Sage
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. PLATT et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Defendant:
EMMERSON, CHRIS, DAVID PLATT and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRETT TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYBERRY v. EMMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
JOSH MAYBERRY
Defendant:
DONALD EMMERSON, LPN, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Recca et al
as 4:2024cv02134
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
PT Recca, PT Sean, PT Emma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
