Cases 31 - 40 of 1,045
Foor v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Phillip Zachary Foor
Defendant:
English, Dentist, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foor v. English et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Phillip Zachary Foor
Defendant:
English, Dentist, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allan Walker v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
as 24-1222
Plaintiff:
ALLAN WALKER
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, DOCTOR MERONDIT, DOCTOR KEENZLY and others
Barry v. English et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Barry
Defendant:
English, Christina Reagle and Justin H. Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Cummings v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Defendant:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, Deputy Superintendent, CHRISTOPHER SYMONS, Deputy Superintendent, C.O. LUKE ERDMAN and others
Tyson v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tyson
Defendant:
Paul English, N. Tote, C/o Sinclair of Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAZ v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
ROLANDO DIAZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL, ENGLISH, WADHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Moore et al
as 3:2023cv01112
Defendant:
Brian English, Moore, Gapski and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guy v. English et al
as 3:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
Dante D Guy and Dante Guy
Defendant:
Brian English, M Morson and Isaac Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR. and CHRISTOPHER JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL R. HARRY, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
