Cases 41 - 50 of 123
BERRY et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, BRANDON PHERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2022cv08016
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JACKSON-BEY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
JOE JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, ERIC HOLCOMB, HYATTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE, et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ERIC HOLCOMB, ROBERT CARTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CABLE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES CABLE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, INDIANA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE, INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Robert Holcomb
as 21-50300
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT ERIC HOLCOMB, AKA Robert Holcomb
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv08271
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
UNDERWOOD v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2021cv02938
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER UNDERWOOD
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION DIRECTOR, DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv02860
Plaintiff:
COREY G. LAWSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICE, WESTVILLE CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. Northwest Indiana (Section 8) et al
as 2:2021cv00350
Plaintiff:
laSandra Norman
Defendant:
Theresa L. Springmann, Diane P. Wood, William J. Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
