Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bell v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv01265
Plaintiff:
Ernest Bell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23192
Plaintiff:
ERNEST BELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BELL v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07004
Plaintiff:
ERNEST BELL
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv01332
Plaintiff:
Maceo G. Willis, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Illinois, Illinois Dept. of Corrections, Stateville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. HOLMES et al
as 1:2012cv07774
Petitioner:
ERNEST BELL
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES and JEFFREY S. CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson et al v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
as 2:2008cv01848
Plaintiff:
Donny Anderson, Barbara Arceneaux, Reginald Ball and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kelly v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv06104
Plaintiff:
Reginald Kelly, Reginald Kelly and Reginald Kelly
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Deronis Cooper, Milton Scott, III and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bell et al v. Lebus International, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bell, David . Bell, Ernest Bell and others
Defendant:
Lebus International, Inc. and The Crosby Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bell et al v. Lebus International Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00425
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bell, David Bell, Ernest Bell and others
Defendant:
Lebus International Inc and The Crosby Group Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
