Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America v. Harris Business Industries, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Harris Business Industries, LLC and Ernest Harris
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Harris v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv01525
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31294
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Sherwin-Williams et al
as 4:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
Ernest Harris
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams and John and Jane Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv01752
Plaintiff:
Ernest Harris
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ruiz v. Reed
as 3:2012cv00483
Defendant:
Ernest Harry Reed
Plaintiff:
Norma Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Davison et al v. Keystone Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00186
Plaintiff:
Tito Davison , Sharon Downing , Dana Draper and others
Defendant:
Keystone Industries, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davison et al v. Keystone Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00570
Plaintiff:
Tito Davison , All Plaintiffs , Sharon Downing and others
Defendant:
Keystone Industries, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv68082
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HARRIS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRIS v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv68567
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HARRIS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
