Cases 1 - 10 of 1,575
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Fernandez Colon)
as 24-1157
Defendant:
ERIC MANUEL FERNANDEZ COLON, ABEL MONTILLA, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Guy v. City of Corpus Christi et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Walter Kevin Guy
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Julianna Siracusa Rivera, Matthew Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Bautista-Esteban
as 24-10371
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pablo Bautista-Esteban
Smith v. Axonics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Axonics, Inc., Michael H. Carrel, Raymond W. Cohen and others
Duarte Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-929
Petitioner:
SONIA YULIETH DUARTE RODRIGUEZ, DIEGO STEVEN LOPEZ MORENO, ANDRES ESTEBAN LOPEZ DUARTE and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Guzman v. Brazon
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Mr Esteban Araujo Guzman and Esteban Araujo Guzman
Defendant:
Bege Andreina Katta Brazon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 Intl Child Abduction Remedies Act
Prada Garcia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2173
Petitioner:
SANDRO PRADA GARCIA, YESICA ALEJANDRA BARRETO NINO, MARLON ESTEBAN PRADA ACOSTA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zuniga et al v. Kifa et al
as 7:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Juan Pedro Zuniga, Alma Alicia Zuniga and Esteban Zuniga
Defendant:
Alex Kifa, Igor Komlov and Kupel Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Esteban v. L'Oreal USA, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv02820
Plaintiff:
Ethel Esteban
Defendant:
L'ORAL USA, INC., and Softsheen-Carson LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hernandez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Esteban Diego Hernandez
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
