Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Tony Jackson v. Commissioner Paul Schnell, et al
as 22-2049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony D. Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Department of Corrections, Minnesota Board of Pardons, Clemency, & Parole, Tim Walz, Governor et al, State of Minnesota and others
Smith v. Arnett, et al
as 5:2022cv05092
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Calvin Arnett, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving Berry, Jr. v. Steve Pfister, et al
as 22-1804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Irving James Berry, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Pfister, LPC and Missouri Sex Offender Program, et al
Raphael Mendez v. Susan Richard Nelson
as 22-1435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Susan Richard Nelson, et al
Jomo v. Kallis
as 0:2021cv02266
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Jomo
Defendant:
Steve Kallis, Rochester Federal Medical Center Et. Al. and United States Federal Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Eberhardt et al
as 8:2021cv00283
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Smith
Defendant:
Rick Eberhardt, Jason Dwinell and Et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean Davidson v. Mark Stringer, et al
as 21-2298
Defendant / Appellee:
Denise Hacker, F.S.H., et al and Mark Stringer, Director of MO Dept of Mental Health, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Simpson v. Stafford #887, et al
as 1:2020cv00276
Plaintiff:
Preston W. Simpson
Defendant:
Stafford #887, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaso v. Dawson County Sherriffs et al et al
as 4:2019cv03106
Defendant:
Dawson County Sherriffs et al, Dawson County Sherriffs Off. Area, Dawson County Sherriffs Off. Schlemat and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Jaso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. State of Nebraska, et al et al
as 8:2019cv00476
Respondent:
State of Nebraska, et al and Brad Johnson
Petitioner:
Yohan Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
