Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Kenneth Eugene Smith v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10095
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EUGENE SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00834
Petitioner:
Kevin E Smith and Kevin Eugene Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: EUGENE SMITH
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tripp
as 4:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Craig Eugene Smith
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: EUGENE SMITH
as 2:2022cv04974
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Eugene Smith v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 22-13781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH EUGENE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kenneth Eugene Smith v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 22-13846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH EUGENE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
SMITH v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2022cv01523
Petitioner:
MARCUS EUGENE SMITH
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, ZAPPALA A. STEPHEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
