Cases 41 - 50 of 260
Hakimuddin et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2008cv01261
Plaintiff:
Samina Hakimuddin, Hakimuddin Ali, S.H. and others
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Emilio Gonzalez, Evelyn Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FAKHOURI v. CHERTOFF et al
as 5:2008cv00190
Plaintiff:
MURAD FAKHOURI
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzales, Evelyn Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Sow et al v. Upchurch et al
as 1:2008cv03600
Plaintiff:
Halimatou Sow and Ousmane Sow
Defendant:
Evelyn Upchurch, Emilio T. Gonzales and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Li et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00920
Plaintiff:
Jianzhong Li, Zhanling Wang and Weishan Li
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Evelyn Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Abumaali v. Michael Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00505
Plaintiff:
Eissa H Abumaali
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Christina Poulos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Abumaali
as 1:2008at00196
Plaintiff:
Eissa H Abumaali
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Christina Poulos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Xue, et al v. Chertoff, et al
as 3:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
Yuming Xue and Ningning Wang
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Emelio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv06156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
