Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gooch v. Evers et al
as 2:2026cv02070
Defendant:
Dr Droughty, Ms Connie, Mr Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Rashad T Gooch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05925
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv07041
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03102
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Miller Container Corporation v. Keystone Technologies LLC et al
as 4:2026cv04256
Plaintiff:
Miller Container Corporation doing business as Liberty Packaging and Liberty Packaging
Defendant:
Jiangsu Ever-Tie Lighting Co Ltd, Keystone Technologies LLC and Jiangsu Ever-Tie Lighting Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv00325
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Salinas-Gomez, et al. v. Blanche
as 26-6800
Petitioner:
EVER ARIEL SALINAS-GOMEZ, MARIA JOSE MARADIAGA-ECHEVERRIA and E. A. S.-M.
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03046
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03352
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
