Cases 11 - 20 of 29
CEELY v. EXEL, INC. D/B/A DHL SUPPLY CHAIN
as 2:2019cv04755
Defendant:
EXEL, INC. D/B/A DHL SUPPLY CHAIN
Plaintiff:
DAVID CEELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamernick v. Daniels et al
as 1:2019cv00119
Defendant:
Donyale Daniels and Exel Inc.
Plaintiff:
Josiah Hamernick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pue v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 1:2018cv04159
Defendant:
Excel Inc., The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Action Logistics, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Antwan M. Pue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hamernick v. Daniels et al
as 2:2018cv00115
Plaintiff:
Josiah Hamernick
Defendant:
Donyale Daniels and Exel Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moutal et al v. Exel, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01444
Defendant:
Exel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Moutal and Andrea Newman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Miller et al v. Exel Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Anthony Miller and Phyllis Miller
Defendant:
Exel Inc , John Does, Kimberly Clark Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Circle K Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Virgil Johnson
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc. and Exel, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Circle K Stores, Inc. and Exel, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Exel, Inc. and Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Casey et al v. Exel Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
Adam S Casey and Hope Casey
Defendant:
Exel Group, Inc., Exel Logistics, Inc., Excel Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. J Rayl Transport Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03122
Plaintiff:
Rodney Adams
Defendant:
J Rayl Transport Inc , Continental Tire The Americas LLC and Exel Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Crown Equipment Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01747
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Pierce
Defendant:
Crown Equipment Corporation , Kraft Food Groups, Inc. , Mondelez Global, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
