Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Ana Santos et al v. Richard Kyle Schneider et al
as 5:2012cv01276
Defendant:
Does, Ean Holdings LLC, Exel Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ana Santos and Teresa Santos
Ingram v. The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company et al
as 4:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Dana Ingram
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company , Industrial Transport, Inc. and Exel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arguello v. Exel Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00184
Defendant:
Exel Inc and Billy Jean Faison
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Arguello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Birky v. Neblock et al
as 2:2008cv00322
Plaintiff:
Mark Birky and Mark Birky
Defendant:
Gregory E Neblock, Gregory E Neblock, Gregory E Neblock and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FORD v. EXEL INC.
as 2:2008cv01735
Plaintiff:
CALVIN FORD
Defendant:
EXEL INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hebert et al v. Dick et al
as 6:2008cv00234
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hebert and Frank Hebert
Defendant:
Curtis C Dick and Exel Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Franklin v. Ballard et al
as 3:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Franklin and Michael R. Franklin
Defendant:
Carnell C. Ballard, Exel, Inc., Lynn W. Mango and others
Cross-Claimant:
Exel, Inc., Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., Carnell C. Ballard and others
Cross Defendant:
Lynn W. Mango, Lynn W. Mango, CBS Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sage et al v. Ballard et al
as 3:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Tim A. Sage, Tim A. Sage, Stephanie R. Sage and others
Defendant:
Carnell C. Ballard, Exel, Inc., Lynn W. Mango and others
Cross-Claimant:
Penske Truck Leasing Company LP, Exel, Inc., Carnell C. Ballard and others
Cross Defendant:
Lynn W. Mango, Lynn W. Mango, CBS Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
