Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Perkins v. SW Gaming LLC et al
as 4:2026cv00106
Plaintiff:
Willie Earl Perkins
Defendant:
SW Gaming LLC d/b/a Harlow's Casino Resort & Spa, Churchill Downs Incorporated and John Doe Manufacturers 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
THURSTON v. BISIGNANO
as 1:2026cv02674
Plaintiff:
EARL THURSTON
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
v. BISIGNANO et al
as 1:2026cv02673
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO and EARL THURSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CRAFT v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC et al
as 5:2026cv00211
Plaintiff:
EARL CRAFT, JR
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC, PASCASIO LOPEZ-PADILLA, RICKY DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Dirkmaat et al
as 2:2026cv00704
Defendant:
Houng Chhour, Paul J. Dirkmaat, Joel A. Ferre and others
Plaintiff:
John Earle Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Alan Clark v. Earl Scott, et al
as 26-2512
Plaintiff:
Alan R. Clark
Defendant:
Earl Scott, Lead Physician, Centurion, Susan Hodges, Nurse Practitioner, Centurion, Howard Kessler, Physician, Centurion and others
Andrews v. Williams (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00613
Plaintiff:
David Earl Andrews, Jr.
Defendant:
Theodore Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earl Gobin v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 26-12588
Plaintiff:
EARL JAMES GOBIN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
